11/25/2023 0 Comments Breaking conways game of lifeThus it acquired some sense of action at a distance. I also tried a variation based on the 8 "neighbouring" cells being one knight's move away, rather than the usual 8 cells in the surrounding square, albeit still using the standard rules. 192.152.5.250 16:35, (UTC) Back in the 1980s, I implemented a simple version of Life on the Commodore PET using the standard rules. Perhaps you would be better off requesting some references for such games in the Cellular automaton article, or better yet creating a List of cellular automata. Such CA wouldn't be life-like, and don't really deserve a place in this article. triangular, hexagonal, or any tilings/network) Thanks. Where can one read about 2d CA that considers the position of neighbors, besides number? Also, there is zero info on life with different grids. 217.233.250.157 10:26, (UTC) in Benutzer:Arbol01Īll the variations in the life family considers the _number_ of neighboring cells. Name: Maximum: Minimum: Art: 4G3 45G3 2G3 Thre are some other oscilating objects in 23/3 (2G3): When I made the comment the second reference was not there. Ok now it's looking like it's well sourced.David Eppstein ( talk) 22:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC) Since when are books by experts in the subject (Conway) not considered adequate? And it would be an embarrassing mistake if that's all they did, but Conway's book also includes a description of an unbounded memory device which together with the logic circuits is enough to simulate 3-counter machines and therefore Turing machines. Capacity to do boolean operations means that conway's game of life is capable of calculating "propositional logic", saying that this is the same as being Turing Complete is an embarrassing mistake. The author of that page have not PROBED that it's a UNIVERSAL turing machine, he only made one turing machine in conway's game on life and SAYS it's extensible to a universal one. It's a simple web page, not a adequate source for wikipedia. David Eppstein ( talk) 16:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC) I linked the same sources to the place where you put the tag.It was already sourced properly elsewhere in the article.Unless someone has a reliable source this has to be fixed. I only added a on the article on the part that says that is turning complete but I'm almost positive that that is incorrect.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |